Page 23 - Voice and representation of platform driver in VietNam
P. 23

CHAPTER 3: Loyalty, exit or voice? Platform workers’ organising strategies  17





               to  create  an  employer  where  none  existed,   People’s  Committee  asking  for  clarification  of  Decree
               providing  workers  who  would  otherwise  be   126/2020/ND-CP.
                                                                            42
               classified  as  self-employed  with  the  security
               of a formal employment relationship. The       In  accordance  with  the  2013  VGCL  Charter,  the
               cooperative will mediate between workers and   syndicates  do  not  have  the  right  to  represent  their
               their clients, so that clients become the clients   members  in  collective  bargaining.  As  the  platform
               of SMart, and workers become the employees     companies  are  not  recognised  as  employers  of
               of SMart.                                      platform workers, the syndicates limit their mandate to
                                                              transferring members’ demands to the local authority
               Legal Strategies                               rather than representing them in negotiations with the
                                                              platforms.
               The  New  York  Taxi  Worker  Alliance  (NYTWA),
               discussed  more  extensively  in  the  section  on   When asked how to better protect drivers’ rights and
               organising,  has  also  helped  workers  bring   interests, nearly 80 percent of drivers and riders called
               multiple  cases  against  Uber.  Initially,  NYTWA   for the selection of their own representatives to hold
               assisted two Uber drivers with filing a successful   formal dialogues with platform companies on upcoming
               unemployment  claim  against  the  company     policy changes. Almost 77 percent of drivers also asked
               (Rivoli, 2016). This ruling may create subsequent   for  more  effective  channels  to  provide  feedback  on
               opportunities for workers to gain employment-  platform policies as well as work conditions, with 65.5
                                           Figure 13: What are the necessary changes to protect better drivers’ rights and interests?
               related  protections  including  unemployment,   percent wanting to establish unions (Figure 13).
               guaranteed  minimum  wage,  and  other  social
               protection  measures.    In  the  United  Kingdom,   Figure  13:  What  are  the  necessary  changes  to  protect
               GMB  -  the  union  for  professional  drivers,  was   better drivers’ rights and interests? (n=351) 43
               successful in bringing forth, to date, one of the
               largest cases regarding worker misclassification
               against  Uber.  GMB  argued  that  despite
               Uber’s  classification  of  drivers  as  independent   Establishing unions          65.53
               contractors, a more appropriate classification for
               drivers would be the United Kingdom’s ‘worker’
               status. The ruling provided 30,000 drivers across
               the United Kingdom access to basic employment   Representatives of drivers
               provisions  including  holiday  pay,  minimum   to dialogue with platforms            79.49
               wage, and breaks (GMB, 2016)




            In  Vietnam,  organising  platform  bike-riders  into   Effective feedback channels      76.92
            syndicates (‘nghiep doan’) was piloted in Ho Chi Minh
            City since 2020. The syndicate is an occupation-based
            union model in the informal sector. The VGCL has
            established  syndicates  of  housemaids,  lottery  sellers,   None of the surveyed drivers were aware of differences
            garbage collectors, fishermen, and traditional bike-riders   between  enterprise  unions  and  syndicates  for  self-
            for  the  past  decade.  Starting  with  the  first  syndicate   employed  workers.  What  is  more  important  for  the
            established in District 7 in July 2020 with 30 members,   surveyed respondents is to have an official channel of
            now there are 12 syndicates for platform bike-riders in   representation to voice their demands and get heard.
            Ho Chi Minh City, as reported by a representative of   The organiser of the bike-rider strike against Grab in
            the HCMC Federation of Labour, in March 2021. The   Hanoi said: “The last strike was mainly spontaneous.
            leaders of these syndicates were appointed by regional   We made calls on Facebook, but only a small number
            federations  of  labour.  The  current  mandate  of  the   of drivers responded. We also sent petitions to the
            syndicates is limited to providing benefits, such as New   unions [Federation of Labour of Hanoi], but it was no
                                                                                          44
            Year’s  gifts  or  sickness  benefits.  During  the  strike  by   use because nothing was official”.
            Grab riders in December 2020, the syndicates collected
            riders’ opinions and sent a petition to the HCMC


            42   Interview with the HCMC Federation of Labour, March 2021.
            43   Note that for this question, the respondents could choose more than one option.
            44   Interview conducted by the researcher in March 2021.







                                                                         Voice and representation of platform drivers in Vietnam
   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26