Page 24 - Voice and representation of platform driver in VietNam
P. 24

18   CONCLUSION





            CONCLUSION




            The sharing economy is a new and growing business    Kingdom, the platform drivers who work full-time
            model.  The  regulatory  frameworks  of  numerous    for at least one month are entitled to social and
            countries  around  the  world  has  been  constantly   health insurance).
            challenged, re-interpreted and revised to fit with this
            new  form  of  work.  In  Vietnam,  whether  or  not  the   •   Instead of using traditional organising tactics, the
            engagement between the platforms and their drivers   trade  unions  should  use  internet-based  channels
            is  defined  as  an  ‘employment  relationship’  remains   to  recruit  membership  from  platforms  for  the
            highly controversial among State agencies. There have   syndicates.
            been calls by the VGCL and labour experts to classify
            the platform drivers as ‘employees’ of the technology   •   The newly-established syndicates should establish
            companies.  However, labour administrators (MOLISA   official  connections  with  the  local  platform
                      45
            and  DOLISAs)  described  this  relationship  as  ‘business   management and the network of team leaders to
            partnership’ and defined the platform drivers as ‘self-  facilitate communication and consultations. The
            employed’ due to their flexibility of working or leaving   union-affiliated guild could be a good model for
            the  platforms  (Interviews  with  representatives  from   these syndicates to adapt to because the best way
            MOLISA and DOLISAs in Hanoi and HCMC).               to ‘win the hearts’ of potential members is to be
                                                                 able to represent their voices in dialogues with the
            However,  as  demonstrated  in  this  study,  the  drivers   platforms.
            – especially those who rely on the platforms as their
            principal source of income and full-time employment,   •   In the case of car-drivers who are registered with
            do  not  necessarily  enjoy  a  lot  of  flexibility.  The   cooperatives, the experience of SMart in Belgium is
            algorithmic  management  that  provides  incentives  for   that the cooperatives can act as the employers of
            prolonged working hours and sanctions for rejections   drivers and deal with the platforms as clients of the
            of work tends to tie the drivers tightly to the platforms   cooperatives. In that way, the sharing rate, bonus,
            rather than offering them more choices.              allocation of orders and other working conditions
                                                                 will be negotiated between the cooperatives and
            The study also reaffirms that despite the new business   platforms.  In  this  way,  the  drivers  will  become
            model,  the  needs  of  the  platform  workers  are  not   employees and are entitled to the employees’
            different from those in traditional sectors: the need to   rights and benefits.
            raise their voices, get their voices heard and negotiate
            with  the  platforms  before  any  substantial  changes   The  surest  thing  about  gig  and  platform  work
            that  affect  their  work  conditions  and  income  are   is  that  it  will  continue  to  evolve.  The  trends
            implemented.                                      and  technological  innovations  are  shaping,  and  will
                                                              continue  to  shape  the  future  of  work.  Workplace
            Before  the  question  of  legal  classification  is  settled,   models  that  encourage  platform  work  are  impacting
            there are a number of things the platforms and relevant   workers  now  and  we  should  expect  these  trends  to
            authorities can do to improve the relationship between   continue. As the ILO Director-General recently pointed
            the platforms and their drivers as well as protect both   out, “it  is  fundamentally  important  that we  confront
            parties’ interests:                               these challenges from the conviction that the future of
                                                              work  is  not  decided  for  us  in  advance.  It  is  a  future
            •   The platform companies should improve their   that  we  must  make  according  to  the  values  and  the
                communication channels to allow for effective and   preferences  that  we  choose  as  societies  and  through
                regular feedback from drivers/riders. Instead of the   the policies that we design and implement” (ILO, 2017).
                ‘take it or leave it’ approach which has proven to
                be  unsustainable,  the  platforms  should  allow  for
                two-way dialogues with their partners.

            •   There  should  be  a  categorisation  of  drivers/
                riders  who  work  full-time  for  the  platforms  and
                those who do not. More benefits and protection
                should be given to those who work full-time for a
                minimum period of time (for example: in the United


            45   See this article, for instance: https://zingnews.vn/tai-xe-la-lao-dong-cua-grab-post1164432.html






            Voice and representation of platform drivers in Vietnam
   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26